Originally posted by Lit
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ODDS OF A 2021 NOJF?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Marignygregg View Post
My point being the BNA's are the gateway drug that gets you to the regional acts. I bet if you ask everyone on this board what got them to Fest, half would say it was a BNA and most of the local acts they currently love were discovered after they booked they're trip and walked thru the gates.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jjazznj View Post
They did not have many BNAs back in '89 when I first started coming. I came wanting to see The Neville Brothers, The Dirty Dozen and Fats Domino.
My first Fest was 92 ( I think ). I came for the Allman Brothers, but got turned onto lots of local acts along the way.
Comment
-
Could it already be time for another round of the Olde Threadhead favorite game "Purists vs Tourists"?
Get those old stories ready (the ones you've only shared here 6,179 times already) and pass out the scorecards, but remember, every time you write "My Spiritual Home" or "Where My Soul Feels Most Free" you automatically lose a turn...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marignygregg View Post
My point being the BNA's are the gateway drug that gets you to the regional acts. I bet if you ask everyone on this board what got them to Fest, half would say it was a BNA and most of the local acts they currently love were discovered after they booked they're trip and walked thru the gates.
One thing I would like to know about that discussion: did the increase in BNAs in the 2000s mean less local acts? Or did the festival grow as a whole? Jazzfest today must have something like 300 local acts. My feeling from the information I see from older festivals is that it wasn't that big before. So even if there are many problems with BNAs (like how the two or three main headliners each day are probably getting more than half the money from tickets, while the other 50 acts or so share the rest), did they really reduce the space dedicated to local music? Honestly asking here, as I don't have that information.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mateus View Post
For me the BNAs worked as an insurance policy to those travelling to the festival for the first time. As I knew local music but wasn't sure if I could really enjoy a festival solely based on that (which now I know I could), the BNAs gave me a sense of "if all else disappoints I still get to see Wilco and Stevie Wonder."
One thing I would like to know about that discussion: did the increase in BNAs in the 2000s mean less local acts? Or did the festival grow as a whole? Jazzfest today must have something like 300 local acts. My feeling from the information I see from older festivals is that it wasn't that big before. So even if there are many problems with BNAs (like how the two or three main headliners each day are probably getting more than half the money from tickets, while the other 50 acts or so share the rest), did they really reduce the space dedicated to local music? Honestly asking here, as I don't have that information.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MormonMatthew View PostCould it already be time for another round of the Olde Threadhead favorite game "Purists vs Tourists"?
Get those old stories ready (the ones you've only shared here 6,179 times already) and pass out the scorecards, but remember, every time you write "My Spiritual Home" or "Where My Soul Feels Most Free" you automatically lose a turn...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marignygregg View Post
Depends on what you consider BNA's. In 89 I knew little about most local acts outside of the Neville's, Fats, Dr. John, but I was quite familiar with Bonnie Raitt, Santana, Buddy Guy, Jimmy Buffet, Richard Thompson, Johnny Winter, John Lee Hooker, George Benson, Van Morrison ( night show ), Miles Davis ( night show ), Robert Cray.........lots of BNA goodness in 89. I'm sure I would have discovered more than a few regional acts wandering the grounds.
My first Fest was 92 ( I think ). I came for the Allman Brothers, but got turned onto lots of local acts along the way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mateus View Post
For me the BNAs worked as an insurance policy to those travelling to the festival for the first time. As I knew local music but wasn't sure if I could really enjoy a festival solely based on that (which now I know I could), the BNAs gave me a sense of "if all else disappoints I still get to see Wilco and Stevie Wonder."
One thing I would like to know about that discussion: did the increase in BNAs in the 2000s mean less local acts? Or did the festival grow as a whole? Jazzfest today must have something like 300 local acts. My feeling from the information I see from older festivals is that it wasn't that big before. So even if there are many problems with BNAs (like how the two or three main headliners each day are probably getting more than half the money from tickets, while the other 50 acts or so share the rest), did they really reduce the space dedicated to local music? Honestly asking here, as I don't have that information.
Jazzfest claims something like 80-85% of all acts are from Louisiana-ish. So the BNAs get the press, but it really still is a local dominated festival, if you count the acts.
There are more (and bigger) national headliners than there were in the 90s and before. But there are also more stages than there used to be (Jazz & Heritage, the Cultural Pavilion) , and more days than there used to be (First Thursday!).Visit my Jazzfest advice site: http://jazzfest.swagland.com/
- Likes 1
Comment
-
We were teasing the member of our krewe who's got 10+ years of fest and still gets the Acura "rail tan" which is a full burn on the right side of your body and mild sun on the left side. He's been front & center for many, many, bna's through the years and his pix help us settle bets on guitar types, etc. - but even he's wandering the grounds a lot more these days than he did to begin with. I applaud his willingness at our age to wade in at the packed stages.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marignygregg View Post
Depends on what you consider BNA's. In 89 I knew little about most local acts outside of the Neville's, Fats, Dr. John, but I was quite familiar with Bonnie Raitt, Santana, Buddy Guy, Jimmy Buffet, Richard Thompson, Johnny Winter, John Lee Hooker, George Benson, Van Morrison ( night show ), Miles Davis ( night show ), Robert Cray.........lots of BNA goodness in 89. I'm sure I would have discovered more than a few regional acts wandering the grounds.
My first Fest was 92 ( I think ). I came for the Allman Brothers, but got turned onto lots of local acts along the way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chopitulas View PostIt was the amount of "roots" music the Festival had when I first started coming in 1990 that made me love it. As has been stated, the "BNA's" then were pretty solidly blues-based artists. Coupling that orientation with what you would encounter on smaller stages and around town when it was, again, blues and "roots" artists not Dead-music and funk ad hoc groupings, and I was in heaven.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment